diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'SW/kblayout/index/document.en.rest.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | SW/kblayout/index/document.en.rest.txt | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/SW/kblayout/index/document.en.rest.txt b/SW/kblayout/index/document.en.rest.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e56d458 --- /dev/null +++ b/SW/kblayout/index/document.en.rest.txt @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +Optimize keyboard layout +======================== + +I'm sure you, too, know the history of the QWERTY keyboard, that was designed +to avoid that too fast typists jammed mechanical typewriters. You would know +also that the Dvorak layout is cosidered by many to be faster and more +effective. + +When I tried to learn to use the Dvorak keyboard, a friend of mine asked me Why +don't you write a program to measure your keyboard usage, and then obtain a +personalized layout?. In a moment of crazyness, I decided to do just that. + +The first program is freq.pl, which reads the files given on the command line +and produces a probability matrix, writing it into the file whose name is in +the $MATRFN variable, default /tmp/freq.matr. Actually it sees the text as a +Markov process over the characters with memory 1, and extracts the transition +matrix. Note: the elements are frequencies, not probabilities. The optional +normalization is left as exercise to the reader. + +The second program is freqdump.pl, which is probably useless. I've written it +(three or four different versions) to have an idea about the frequencies. Give +it a look if you want. + +The most useful program (I hope) is optkeyb.pl, which starting from the matrix +(as usual, filename hardcoded) and the QWERTY layout searches by stochastic +gradient descent a better layout. In other words, it calculates a value for the +layout (sum over the pairs of keys of their distance times the frequency of +that pair), then tries to exchange two random keys looking for a better result. +To avoid local minima (there are a lot) it starts by randomly exchanging +$PRE_SHUFFLE pairs, and if it doesn't find a better layout for $STARVATION +tries it starts again, after having written the locally optimum layout at the +end of the file /tmp/layouts. It uses curses and the corresponding Perl module +Curses.pm. + +To avoid bad things, like numbers scattered between other keys, it's possible +to set into the %locked hash the keys that must not be moved. + +To give yoy an idea of the results, after some hours of computation the best +layout was: + +:: + + + ` 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ; = + - x w h t s a l b y ' j q + z \ [ c i e r u p . , + k v f d n o m g ] / + +.. + + + +Bear in mind I use a IBM U.S. keyboard, and where the q is, there's usally the +backslash/pipe key, which is larger than the others, so I should have locked +it... + +To have an idea of the optimization, the value relative to the QWERTY layout is +10.190.280, for the one above is 6.797.370, meaning a 34% reduction in the +space travelled by the fingers during writing. |