summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt')
-rw-r--r--src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt55
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt b/src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cff3242
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/SW/is-android-free/document.en.rest.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+=============================
+ Is Android “free software”?
+=============================
+:CreationDate: 2009-09-17 10:59:01
+:Id: SW/is-android-free
+:tags: - software
+ - rant
+
+A couple of months ago, I bought a `Samsung Galaxy (I7500) phone`_; it
+runs a version of the Android_ environment. I'm reasonably happy with
+it: it works as a phone, it allows me to stay connected when I'm not
+at home, and developing applications for it does not seem too hard.
+
+I have a big gripe, though: I can't touch the OS.
+
+No, I don't mean "I don't have ``root`` access": I know how to get it,
+and I even pretty much agree with the whole «make it as hard as
+possible for users (or malicious software) to brick the phone».
+
+What I mean is this: I have the (purported) `source code of the
+Android system`_, from the Linux kernel up to the various
+applications. But I can't do anything useful with it: I don't have the
+"corresponding source", to use GPLv3_ terminology. There is no way for
+me to rebuild the exact same system image that is running on my
+phone. The FSF_ says that the `Apache license version 2.0`_ is a
+"`free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL`_", but
+it's apparently possible to release a set of programs under it, and
+have the resulting collection not meet the `free software
+definition`_: I can't actually run the program!
+
+OK, I can run it on the emulator. I say that's not good
+enough. Samsung has given me a binary copy of their Android
+version. According to the license, they are in no obligation to give
+me the source code. How can I call this "free software"?
+
+As an aside, the reason I started this rant is this: there are a few
+features that I would like to change (e.g. add support for OpenVPN_ to
+the nexus_ program; add the ability to change input language for each
+input box, independently from the system locale). Since I can't
+actually benefit from those changes (I can't build a new Samsung image
+with my modifications, and use it), and I don't have any assurance as
+to when they will arrive on my phone (assuming they are accepted in
+the Android platform), why should I even attempt to make them?
+
+.. _`Samsung Galaxy (I7500) phone`:
+.. _Android: http://www.android.com/
+.. _`source code of the Android system`: http://source.android.com/
+.. _GPLv3: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html
+.. _FSF: http://www.fsf.org/
+.. _`Apache license version 2.0`: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+.. _`free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL`: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/#apache2
+.. _`free software definition`: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html
+.. _OpenVPN: http://www.openvpn.net/
+.. _nexus: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/core.git;a=tree;f=nexus;h=5ac2cb9f0cee2394fa2d070d3df309090e222828;hb=refs/heads/donut
+